Latest videos by TheReasonWhyGuy

Random Simulation Compilation Posted by: TheReasonWhyGuy Video duration: 186 seconds A compilation of some simulations I've made over the past months. 1) Simulations showing gravity, and bodies with different rigidity. 2) Simulations showing alternate dimensions possible chemistry 3) A Simulation showing a simple evolved stealth. 4 different programs are shown in this video Related: random, simulation, compilation Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: I watch this and I ... By: lecagot2. on 11 Nov 11, 22:44:53 I watch this and I sense that I am on the edge? of truth, the threshold of reality and enlightenment or it could be I am just high. Let me think about it. Yeah :) Thanks for ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 03 Nov 11, 15:56:30 Yeah :) Thanks for the kind words...I do post videos every? once in a blue moon, if you want to subscribe ;D That's kinda what I ... By: Blacklemon67a. on 03 Nov 11, 10:44:19 That's kinda what I meant, I meant videos that display masterful coding rather than people making pointless? videos about pointless things academia is alive ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 03 Nov 11, 07:55:54 academia is alive and well on youtube, however this isn't an academic video. It's just? a hobby creation :P I always like to ... By: Blacklemon67a. on 03 Nov 11, 03:04:40 I always like to see videos like this,? it shows me that academia is alive and well on youtube. Thanks :D The music ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 27 Oct 11, 01:00:49 Thanks :D The music is by Vincent Parrish, an amazing indie music composer. I'm working on another video with newer, more? accurate simulations. .... calm... . .... ... By: joseakadaman. on 26 Oct 11, 23:59:19 .... calm... . ..... I'M? HOOKED I thought this was ... By: 1DanConnors. on 12 Oct 11, 07:08:50 I thought this was your personal website with unlimited posting size. But I'm viewing a little ticker bar under this comment that has been steadily ticking down (from 500) ever since I? started typing. Nice video by the way. Nice. what is the? ... By: 1RothMan. on 09 Jul 11, 13:40:02 Nice. what is the? music? When they collide, ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 22 May 11, 08:11:10 When they collide, they transfer? momentum... first two clips ... By: gexwing. on 21 May 11, 21:14:24 first two clips especially? "how did you make ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 21 May 11, 03:54:29 "how did you make them stick together?" You'll have to be more specific... several simulations are in this? video... so which one? how did you make ... By: gexwing. on 21 May 11, 02:42:50 how did you make them stick? together? repelling force if they're close? i made some "gravity" (1/r and 1/r^2 force) particle simulations myself, it's fun to watch randomly placed points form clusters :) It's fine! ;) Sorry ... By: raydredX. on 04 Apr 11, 20:34:13 It's fine! ;) Sorry, if I wasn't clear enough.? Sorry for being a ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 04 Apr 11, 20:07:24 Sorry for being a grammar douche nazi :|? I omitted part of ... By: raydredX. on 04 Apr 11, 12:43:48 I omitted part of the? phrase "what programs (you used) too". But thanks for enlightening me. um... grammatically ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 04 Apr 11, 07:36:13 um... grammatically speaking, that makes no sense. HOWEVER, I'll guess you're asking, either what language these are written in. OR what the programs are called? They are written using gml,? which is similar to c++ And they are programs I made, which most don't technically have a "name" They have project names... I'm curious about ... By: raydredX. on 03 Apr 11, 16:50:38 I'm curious about what? programs too? "Is there a ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 21 Dec 10, 04:51:46 "Is there a difference in intrinsic properties between the? white and blue particles" Kinda... the blue ones are softer and the white ones are hard. They have the same mass, and everything else :) Really excellent! ... By: julsHz. on 20 Dec 10, 13:22:14 Really excellent! Is there a difference in intrinsic properties between the white and blue? particles? I'd love to see the source code for the first four visualizations and the one starting 2:13. Looks like something I could use to visualize stellar or galactic evolution. Cheers! juls What programming ... By: wolfgangouille. on 19 Dec 10, 15:07:16 What programming langage do you use? I've done such things with MATLAB and developped a kind of simplified cells in java,? on which I'd like to implement natural selection, in order to see what solutions evolution would find to a given problem. So, how many angry ... By: sp00x. on 19 Dec 10, 01:46:11 So, how many angry letters from religious people crying "STOP PLAYING GOD!" will you get? now? ;) Ooooh, blue and ... By: 83N170. on 18 Dec 10, 10:25:46 Ooooh, blue and swirly, I? like it! So...? that's how ... By: deepashtray. on 18 Dec 10, 02:19:26 So...? that's how cheese is made: ) A TransHuman Dream [with word abuse] Posted by: TheReasonWhyGuy Video duration: 40 seconds I dream of a day, when what makes us capable, is able to be improved, using the very thing which is causing the improvement. Accelerating acceleration... when the engine is more able, the faster it goes, the only limit, is the universe itself. Related: transhuman, dream, the, singularity Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: It's easy to spew ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 12 May 12, 07:07:19 It's easy to spew nonsense, so long as you have the right rhythm. Anyway, more to the point, your statement? leads me to believe you didn't understand the video. Please, if you understood the video, actually pose an argument. Thank you "Electricity ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 11 May 12, 00:13:31 "Electricity doesn't extend it's grip into the soul" It does for paralyzed people who use brain implants to use computers. I'm not suggesting that it's a simple moral problem. I also think it's way too easy to dismiss something essentially on the grounds that it is new. In addition, I think it's way? to easy to adopt something just because it's new. These ideas must be debated and thought about. Electricity doesn't ... By: VZerda. on 10 May 12, 19:25:46 Electricity doesn't extend it's grip into the soul, pacemakers don't alter brain function, glasses don't imbue people with answers without needing to search for them. Sewing machines don't demote the intrinsic search? for meaning that we all must go through. The fundamental ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 30 Apr 12, 10:32:25 The fundamental ideas of transhumanism are supported by most people. The ideas are applied as.... Glasses, dentures, pacemakers, brain implants which allow the paralyzed to use computers.... Pretty? much any time that technology is used directly to replace/enhance someones body in some way. This video just talks about the eventuality of this process, and the idea is not evil. I see it as being similar to how the Amish rejected electricity, so too will many people reject the idea. funny wordplay, but ... By: VZerda. on 30 Apr 12, 02:18:47 funny wordplay, but I seriously hope this is a criticism and not a support- boiling it down to its basic concepts such as described is cause for? more revulsion than support. this idea is ... By: igotyourmomful. on 04 Mar 12, 06:38:59 this idea is horrible what is the point of being a machine to live longer than the rest of our speceis this is a? horrible idea immortality is a distguting idea. Okay, I think I now ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 01 Mar 12, 03:33:09 Okay, I think I now understand you. The paths that culture and government can take are always a concern. People can? become so heartless, and governments can become so controlling. I hope that we don't have those problems, or that as they emerge we can stop them well Ok, if you can ... By: MachinasDeusEx. on 29 Feb 12, 12:02:40 well Ok, if you can see, I am not against transhumanism, I am for, but what I am against is for the society,? not so educated, not so elevated to understand transhumanism as a goal for the mankind and not for differentiate, classify us ... and even control us.. I am not against, just the derives it can take I have a simple ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 29 Feb 12, 09:14:43 I have a simple question for you. Do people with pacemakers compare each others model and decide not to be friends because someone else has an older model? OF COARSE NOT, THAT'S DUMB! Anyway, where I'm from is not important. The only reason? I asked you is because I had trouble understanding what you meant. sorry where are? ... By: MachinasDeusEx. on 29 Feb 12, 04:43:46 sorry where are? you from ? A very simple ... By: MachinasDeusEx. on 29 Feb 12, 04:41:23 A very simple exemple is that some "non desired babies" became great men in the history! and changed? the world ... Transhumanism, believing "what is wrong and what is good" will eliminate every possibility of change... considering that not every thing we considere "mistake" is a mistake .... Sorry for the long text... but is an interesting debate, and I believe that human is not prepared to .. only watching how extremism are rising in Europe like people vote for far right mvt what about the ... By: MachinasDeusEx. on 29 Feb 12, 04:38:05 what about the understanding of the universe ? What about people who won't change their human nature ? will they be rejected by a new updated consumerist "transhumanist" society ? what about "less advantaged people" ? will they be just eliminated ? what about the free will and decision for reproduce ? what about accidental? pregnancy?? I have to remember to you that those "mistakes" make the nature of the mankind what it is ! and that "mistakes" produce sometimes changes ... "is making ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 29 Feb 12, 04:35:06 "is making ourselves another product" No, unless you think glasses, or contact lenses? make us into products. Unless you oppose pacemakers, since they "make us another product" AND, become another ... By: MachinasDeusEx. on 29 Feb 12, 04:35:00 AND, become another product, will NOT make us advance, we will be like iphones or any other technological fashion product .. Transhuman A : What ? you are not updated ? Transhuman B : No, I have no money for ! Transhuman A : So we can't be friends, you are poor and not upload ! Do you see ? a society where superficial thing matter, having the last "upload" "arm" "eye" "game" and what about scientific? progress, what about our nature ?? what about problems beyond ? What I mean, is the ... By: MachinasDeusEx. on 29 Feb 12, 04:29:42 What I mean, is the way transhumanism is exposed in this video, is making ourselves another product, This kind? of tranhumanism is evil, is wrong... and if a kid dies, is only the natural equilibrium, dead isn't necessary evil ... in any case nothing is forever... We can improve ourselves and adapt to live in the Space, that is a good thing for exemple... but saying that we would only work to "understand" ourselves is forgetting to interact with our environment... Transhumanism isn't ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 29 Feb 12, 03:40:53 Transhumanism isn't about living in a perfect world, since if we ever did, we would have no reason for improving ourself, and the transhumanism would have no goals. As for loving our flaws... I love them too, however the flaws people would? want to get rid of are things like decease and hunger. You can still cry, and then remember how much you would love to cure all decease. But would you go to a dying kid and tell him that you like that he's dying. It's evil Hmm, I think you ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 29 Feb 12, 03:37:46 Hmm, I think you are confusing the attitude of transhumanism with that of humanism. Humanism is VERY anthropocentric, however transhumanism is all about seeing our flaws and wanting to improve ourselves. Yes both ideas are very focused on ourself, however we need some way to think about ourself. Without a philosophy about the future and? nature of humanity, our actions would be aimless I think I have to many things to respond to for me to fit them in this comment Change my opinion, ... By: MachinasDeusEx. on 28 Feb 12, 22:57:27 Change my opinion, decide, feel, say, not? take everything yet prepared... Right french is my ... By: MachinasDeusEx. on 28 Feb 12, 22:54:58 Right french is my mother tongue.... no! what I mean is that Transhumanism is very anthropocentric? "oh human we are the best oh human we are the center of the Universe" do you see ??? and personally i prefer living with my everyday problems, than living in a "eugenic perfect transhumanist society" I want just to LIVE ! Cry, feel, be wounded, hear, Talk, learn from my mistakes, do you see ? Even i prefer learn english, and know I'm wrong than clic it and "download" it in my mind French is your ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 28 Feb 12, 20:49:13 French is your native language right? I'm not? sure what you're saying... are you saying that somehow transhumanism would some how eliminate our environment? or interfere with any of the other things you mentioned. Well I am Pro ... By: MachinasDeusEx. on 28 Feb 12, 17:04:00 Well I am Pro Transhumanism BUT, for be more intelligent for INTERACT with our environment ... to colonize the Space, to ADAPT our selves to other environment and for? only focus in the human nature.... I love being creative and for that we need a environment Great video man, ... By: onesevenfiveone. on 21 Jan 12, 16:49:08 Great video man, I'm also looking forward? to the Singularity. I'm studying artificial intelligence at university currently, so hopefully I'll end up working with this kind of technology somewhere along the line. "just some empty ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 27 Nov 11, 23:22:28 "just some empty signal sent to indicate pain happyness" So you think the mind isn't within the brain? Since if the mind is within the brain, then pain and happyness ARE? merely complex signals. life itself. what ... By: truth2350. on 27 Nov 11, 15:00:54 life itself. what if the feeling is no longer the way it was, just some empty signal sent to indicate pain happyness, that is essentialy what it is now but what if it is nothing like its former quality. also I dont believe the human spirit ,or ghost if you will, can be put in a shell. I already see people walking around like they have no soul, maybe they would be perfect candidates Idk. Convincing people that theyre machines will make them expendable just like machines.? Hey Guys: I have a question for you [Approach] Posted by: TheReasonWhyGuy Video duration: 22 seconds Related: hey, guys, thereasonwhyguy, existance, exist, why, the, reason, guy, downloads Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: I? guess the ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 03 Jul 11, 11:21:24 I? guess the question comes down to, do you think being a fundamentalist about anything, really effects you enough to cause the world to be a worse place. OR is it more minor than we might think... It's a very complex ... By: penzeseszter. on 29 Jun 11, 14:49:22 It's a very complex question and it depends on the content of the words. The first option seems more logical at the first sight, for example we would have less conflicts, a more productive society but is that the most important? And who are the liberal theists and the theistic fundamentalists? If that means that? the first group follows religious laws more or less and the second one strictly, I would prefer the second version because in that way, at least some of us could enter the Heaven. The 2nd one. Why ... By: Comp1337e. on 12 Apr 11, 16:36:21 The 2nd one. Why should anyone be half-assed in their beliefs? The correct one would be compromising when they shouldn't be. ? Let the truth speak for itself. The firsts one, ... By: dancingwithcalvin. on 01 Mar 11, 00:43:48 The firsts one, obviously. Less confrontation, more open mindedness, and thats how society progresses.? Sorry for the delay ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 11 Dec 10, 08:35:12 Sorry for the delay, I've been busy, however you were at the top of my reply list :) "I just meant that some people aren't worth the explanation" I partially agree, trolls aren't worth it, however distinguishing trolls from the ignorant and or aggressive is an arduous task. Thanks for the kind words, it's rare to find people who can carry on a conversation, without becoming blindly aggressive. I'll give you much? deserve credit for being cool headed, and reasonable. :) Take care no, you and your ... By: Steaksngainers. on 01 Dec 10, 16:11:51 no, you and your sniper words know what's up. I just meant that some people aren't worth the explanation. Obviously, using purer words makes you more eloquent, and eloquent people are misunderstood less. thats a? win. I know what you ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 01 Dec 10, 07:43:44 I know what you mean :) However, I think using "purer" words is a? smart idea. Instead of using words which convey meaning like a shot gun. I find it much wiser to choose words which act like high quality sniper rifles. Then again, if you're wanting to start unnecessary arguments, which have little to no intellectual value. Be my guest... Definitely. I guess ... By: Steaksngainers. on 30 Nov 10, 19:19:13 Definitely. I guess I don't mind if the people who couldn't understand that want to flame me. There are just certain? opinions that don't matter, as a youtuber, I'm sure you know what I mean. Have a great day, friend. "Just as there IS ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 30 Nov 10, 19:09:45 "Just as there IS religious dogma, and most dogma is religious, dogma itself is not invariably? religious." I absolutely agree. "The primary use of a word doesn't change its definition" I absolutely agree, however you can't use this as an excuse to ignore connotation I'm just saying that using the word faith in the place of confidence or trust will cause unneeded arguments. I agreed with you, because I could see past it's connotation, allot of people can't. I'm just trying to help I hate to drag this ... By: Steaksngainers. on 30 Nov 10, 14:07:07 I hate to drag this on, I'm really not trying to waste your time, but I think you've overlooked the definition of faith, and how it applies to? religion. The two are not inseparable. Just as there IS religious dogma, and most dogma is religious, dogma itself is not invariably religious. The primary use of a word doesn't change its definition, but used in specific context, it may provide additional information. Sayng "I've got faith" might imply religious faith or confidenc "... to dissuade me ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 30 Nov 10, 07:04:10 "... to dissuade me from using the word "faith" simply because it can potentially be used in a religious context..." Not at all, that would be ridiculous. Instead of saying "can potentially be used", try "is primarily used" then you may understand. If a word simply could be used in a religious context, I wouldn't have an argument. However the common modern use of the word is "religious faith". Blame it on? ministers or televangelists, but don't try to ignore or dismiss it. I will indeed take ... By: Steaksngainers. on 30 Nov 10, 02:34:17 I will indeed take care, and I hope you do too. :) However, If you're attempting to dissuade me from using the word "faith" simply because it can potentially be used in a religious context, I'd have to call you a? jackass. Well, it isn't ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 30 Nov 10, 00:51:09 Well, it isn't simply something which can be blamed on people adding additional information to a word. Its how the English language? works, words acquire extra meaning by how they are commonly used, which turns from misuse into implied meaning, into connotation, then finally into a component of a newer definition. So just as I recognize the foundational, and fundamental meaning of the word faith, I'm trying to inform you of its connotation. Anyway, take care :) well you're clearly ... By: Steaksngainers. on 29 Nov 10, 21:18:12 well you're clearly intelligent enough to understand what I'm talking about, despite the "Undeniable religious connections", but faith is a concept adopted by some religions, not all religions, and it was not? invented or copyrighted by any religion in any way. It means trust and confidence, which are requirements in religions featuring faulty information. It isn't my fault if you or anyone else associates additional religious information with the words I use, so try not to. :) Yes, however to use ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 29 Nov 10, 20:59:00 Yes, however to use the word faith without recognizing its blatant connotation is to invite anger from some people. Faith means trust and confidence, however it also has undeniable religious connections, which then used on science, implies a simple, and equivalent duality, which I disagree with to some degrees. It's easy to? simply believe, it's hard to believe for good, unbiased reasons. "I agree with your ... By: Steaksngainers. on 29 Nov 10, 16:06:33 "I agree with your answer, but not parts of how you got there." Interestingly, thats kind of a metaphor for what I'm saying about science. Everything is more complicated than it seems. 1+1=2 is basic reasoning, but to prove that 1+1=2 is actually quite dificult. True, science delivers accurate, predictable responses, but in order to compile our? understanding of the universe requires confidence in each individual fact and layer. so trust, yes, is the word. science is good tho If it had to be ... By: xxSilverPhinxx. on 29 Nov 10, 14:07:55 If it had to be static, (which luckily isn't a real scenario anyways), then I would go with option 1. It just *might* be more peaceful that way, even though everybody has their? own interpretation of god and god's will. "I would prefer the ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 29 Nov 10, 08:38:16 "I would prefer the first, because science has always required as much faith as religion" Perhaps, I don't? see it that way, however if by faith you mean trust and confidence then perhaps. For instance, you could say that... Religion is faith in the word of man about god. Science is faith in method, which is trusted by the results it delivers. I agree with your answer, but not parts of how you got there. I disagree with #1 ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 29 Nov 10, 08:35:45 I disagree with #1 of your answer, because it falls outside of the scenario. This is because the answer wasn't to say a point from which things will change, but rather as a static state, with people constantly balanced by population. I agree with #2 of your answer. This question isn't about change, but? rather about conditions, and optional paths which our actions/inactions may lead down. I would go with ... By: xxSilverPhinxx. on 20 Nov 10, 23:19:53 I would go with option 2 for 2 reasons Firstly,there's nothing to indicate that a portion of people on opposite ends of the spectrum can't or won't gravitate towards more moderate and liberal grounds, which is more or less what we see today and secondly,variability is a good thing. Even in an idealised hypothetical world, it's not a good thing to have it consisting of narrow and similar worldviews,they don't police eachother very well,and theism is easily a breeding ground for bad ideas.? I would prefer the? ... By: Steaksngainers. on 09 Nov 10, 22:51:46 I would prefer the? first, because science has always required as much faith as religion. If you don't believe me, consider ancient science. I'll wait. Now consider the possible future understanding of the universe through science. Infinite possibilities hide in the peripherals of modern vision. I'm assuming that "moderate" refers to their ability to reason as rational, nearly objective intellectuals. Any plan that will ... By: ruffomaldito. on 09 Oct 10, 14:57:35 Any plan that will allow for feedback, maintain a balance, and leave room for argumentation would give? the best option, in my opinion. Would you, as an atheist, rather that liberal, moderate, and fudamentalist theists adopt atheism? The fewer Beers I ... By: sausage4mash. on 02 Sep 10, 22:22:01 The fewer Beers I consume the better my spelling and grammar . I've come to a conclusion religion is not a problem in and of itself fundamentalism is and obviously fundamentalists or those heading towards that road (* cough Pat Condell) ? need not be religious . GRAMMAR NAZI TIME!! ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 02 Sep 10, 19:41:40 GRAMMAR NAZI TIME!!! You should have? typed "fewer wars" or "less war" instead of "less wars". :) Besides my grammar Nazi side, I absolutely agree with you, and it shows that you see the big picture :D 1st for pragmatic ... By: sausage4mash. on 02 Sep 10, 19:23:02 1st for pragmatic reasons ,less wars .? Hey Guys: I have a question for you [Existance] Posted by: TheReasonWhyGuy Video duration: 17 seconds Related: hey, guys, thereasonwhyguy, existance, exist, why, the, reason, guy Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: .... it doesn't add ... By: thuseruseu. on 21 Aug 11, 16:21:28 .... it doesn't add up... wouldn't it be better to ask? diffrent then? The basis of this ... By: HimesInu. on 21 Aug 11, 15:17:21 The basis of this question, regardless if a man lives forever or not, is if you'd rather be man? or god. a man? doesn't ... By: thuseruseu. on 21 Aug 11, 11:04:18 a man? doesn't exsist forever... yet... thought it's not so far from now^^ No, he's asking if ... By: HimesInu. on 20 Aug 11, 03:40:44 No, he's asking if you'd rather? be man or god. I'd rather that I ... By: HimesInu. on 20 Aug 11, 03:39:58 I'd rather that I existed and no one know. Even if nobody knew I existed, I would know that I had an impact on? the world. Sometimes the biggest and best impacts are the ones that no one ever learns about. I? don't care if ... By: jfeltes. on 09 Jul 11, 04:43:39 I? don't care if anyone knew I existed its not the story that's important but the experience and the existence I would choose ... By: penzeseszter. on 29 Jun 11, 14:10:13 I would choose identity, so we could say, exictence is more important for me than being known by? others. Probably that means that I wouldn't add too many things to the common knowledge, wouldn't leave anything behind me but I would experience which is more valuable. And maybe it is strange to declare this but I truly believe the pleasure of life is above everything. number one is ... By: thuseruseu. on 20 May 11, 12:15:26 number one is excisting and number two is being fantasy. since evryone know who i am and i have never existed i am made up from an idea. a little like jesus, unless hes real ofc. well anyway i'll say i would want evryone to know who you are and never have exist.existing forever in itself is painful. but when no one knows u exsist theres no point in exsisting. now is there =P ?? they know you as ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 17 May 11, 19:26:36 they know you as you are... your? merits and faults... anything notable, and memorable. Not all of your embarrassing moments, or every good deed, but anything that might matter to you, and to others. depends of what ... By: thuseruseu. on 17 May 11, 17:59:21 depends of what reason evryone know me? for^^ so your asking if i ... By: thuseruseu. on 17 May 11, 17:58:50 so your asking if i either wana be? santa or jesus? Sorry it's taken so ... By: paulx78. on 25 Nov 10, 13:23:50 Sorry it's taken so long to reply. What I mean by existence is the ability to perceptually experience the physicality of the universe however holographic Quantum? physicists believe it to be. I wouldn't really like to favour any of the questions you posted. Regardless of whether your ego gets in the way or not it's important to not deceive yourself of the present , so enjoy that experience & be thankful for it :-) I would pick option ... By: xxSilverPhinxx. on 20 Nov 10, 23:21:08 I would pick option one, though with restrictions. Existing forever must be? a tiring thing. "So either way ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 29 Sep 10, 14:53:55 "So either way people will forget. But at least? this way I will always remember" No, the idea is, that you will be remembered forever, even if you never existed. It's a choice between fame and identity. Existence and cultural persistence. Imagine Santa never existed. The idea of santa might go on in culture for a long time, now imagine a form of yourself preserved in culture forever. ID? VS EGO Exist forever. ... By: TheWhiteRabbit1990. on 29 Sep 10, 06:52:33 Exist forever. People are going to die, hence they will forget me. So either way people will forget. But at least this way I will always remember. Besides,? most people suck and I wouldn't care if they knew me. And if I die......who the crap cares if they remember me. I'll be dead, so I sure as hell wont give a fuck. I would rather live ... By: lv2sing103. on 07 Sep 10, 19:47:36 I would rather live forever and be able to do great things even if no one knew about me. And? if you are known doesn't it depend on what your known for?? "And then I? would ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 27 Aug 10, 03:09:29 "And then I? would eventually figure out how to kill myself," That's not allowed... if you choose existence, then you have to always exist, if you choose to be known, then you must always be known. i would like to ... By: Melechkibitzer. on 27 Aug 10, 02:14:09 i would like to exist forever as long as i had some meaningful affect? effect? on reality. why would it matter if i were forgotten by things that could never outlive me anyway? i could be godlike! ? I could manipulate the universe! It could by my computer on which to record my legacy which I would write for myself. And then I would eventually figure out how to kill myself, hopefully to restart the universe? I'm just SOC writing so yeah. I would rather ... By: SanityInAnarchy. on 11 Jul 10, 00:28:41 I would rather experience life, but it would be a much easier choice if only a few people? knew about me -- more or less like we have now. I don't know that I'd want to exist forever, certainly not without qualification. "It all depends on ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 19 Jun 10, 11:06:30 "It all depends on what your definition of exsistance is" Existence as in, the? ability to experience. It all depends on ... By: paulx78. on 17 Jun 10, 17:26:45 It all depends on what your? definition of exsistance is?? My choice would be to experience life regardless of who knew about me. That's erroneous ... By: goog2k. on 15 May 10, 22:15:51 That's erroneous question. We've all existed forever. Carl Sagan said, "We? are star stuff" and "a way for the cosmos to know itself." All the atoms on earth and in our bodies came from supernova that blew up over 5 billion years ago. We're all walking, talking stardust -- this cosmos become AWAKE and looking back at itself? -- & aren't we intimately connected to it all? We are existence become AWAKE Enjoy the dance. BTW, nothing separates us from others in this grand mystery. Please be kind. lol... a? real ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 10 May 10, 07:08:13 lol... a? real world example XD You know what's ... By: theprodigy2186. on 10 May 10, 06:44:21 You know what's funny? I'm actually writing a book right now, but I am writing it under a pen name, "Anon E. Moss". If all goes to plan, it is possible that such a book could have a huge impact, and yet... no one would know my name ;? ) "and I don't see ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 10 May 10, 06:08:36 "and I don't see any value in having people remember me. " Well, a value some put to it is, that having everyone know "who" you are, would have a far greater impact on the scheme of things, than merely existing. Though some have said that, acting without being known can have that same advantage :| Most choices are? justifiable, but I agree with you, but for me, it's because I want to exist XD This question is actually about which is valued more, ID or EGO :) An argument with someone from a different faith Posted by: TheReasonWhyGuy Video duration: 45 seconds A Version of "How to argue with someone from a different faith" Made for ATHEIST BLIND CHICK Related: religion, christianity, islam, christian, muslim, jesus, mohammed, allah, god, jehovah, yahweh, judaism Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Pirsig had ... By: bobbygnosis. on 09 Apr 12, 15:34:49 Pirsig had something to say about the last two? sentences you wrote. I'd reccomend reading Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Mainanence. He comes up with a "philosophical system" near the end that even he himself later admits is ridiculous, but if you take it with a grain of salt the book has a lot to offer on this very subject. "Logic does not ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 09 Apr 12, 12:33:03 "Logic does not denote belief." I absolutely agree. However the difference in the motive for? beliefs is what is important. Many people stop at asking "what do you believe". When they should then also ask "why do you believe". Science in my opinion, is less about alleged facts and theories, and more about the method used. Most importantly, any idea in science could be overturned by the right discovery. However as a body of evidence builds, the likelihood of finding that discovery shrinks. Haha, NO MAN, ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 09 Apr 12, 12:18:53 Haha, NO MAN, you're fine. Everyone mistakes joke comments as serious ones every once? in a while. Haha, NO? MAN, ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 09 Apr 12, 12:18:13 Haha, NO? MAN, you're fine. Everyone mistakes joke comments as serious ones every once in a while. well don't I look ... By: zakkory. on 08 Apr 12, 17:00:59 well don't I look like a? total derp now :/ he was joking? derp By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 07 Apr 12, 05:50:36 he was joking? derp dude your argument ... By: zakkory. on 06 Apr 12, 16:46:07 dude your argument is crap how would you know if he was a deity? or a god? your bible said he was a god as in god the son. so he is a god. derpty? derp Just with? 100% ... By: TheBiAtheist. on 04 Mar 12, 11:54:45 Just with? 100% more blood. jesus was a deity,? ... By: xaqshana. on 23 Oct 11, 02:23:55 jesus was a deity,? not a god. Check mate, athiesm. wrong, 98% CRO ... By: bikini1212. on 11 Sep 11, 17:52:34 wrong, 98% CRO MAGNON, modern human is CRO? MAGNON, not African? Erectus Beliefs have ... By: bobbygnosis. on 23 Aug 11, 00:37:14 Beliefs have nothing to do with definitions or logic. People believe in illogical things all the? time. People also believe in logical things too. Since beliefs can be of things either logical or illogical then it follows that beliefs are not constrained by logic. Logic does not denote belief. If your beliefs are ... By: joeychuck35. on 23 Aug 11, 00:24:33 If your beliefs are by? definition illogical. Then yes. They are free from the constraints of logic :-) You are absolutely ... By: bobbygnosis. on 23 Aug 11, 00:02:44 You are absolutely correct. Beliefs are free? from the constraints of logic and reason. Science has nothing ... By: joeychuck35. on 22 Aug 11, 23:11:15 Science has nothing to do with? being an atheist. I can believe god doesnt exist because there is no proof even if I didnt believe in evolution or cosmology or gravity. They are not required to be related subjects. Because the people ... By: HimesInu. on 29 Jul 11, 22:13:09 Because the people behind? the war are afraid of losing the power that they hold because of their beliefs. I agree only in ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 13 Jul 11, 19:43:53 I agree only in part. Any human can become dogmatic and irrational about a belief. However, the point of this video is, to illustrate how pointless religious arguments between different groups seem to an atheist.? It's not an argument, just a comment. If you want an argument, then I have other videos which you can argue about. "To assume ... By: bobbygnosis. on 13 Jul 11, 16:55:08 "To assume knowledge, is to ensure ignorance" ^I completely agree with that. "The key being, that we MUST maintain a willingness to learn, and be skeptical of what we think we've learned." ^Fundamentalist materialists are often just as dogmatic? as Christians. The only thing about which I'm commenting is that the same righteousness from the Christians to the atheists can be seen from the atheists to the Christians. Truth be told I don't really care. It's just funny. "that our fixed ' ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 13 Jul 11, 07:05:13 "that our fixed 'Truths'" To? assume knowledge, is to ensure ignorance. Anything we have reasons to believe, can be shown as wrong. The key being, that we MUST maintain a willingness to learn, and be skeptical of what we think we've learned. People who believe in God, believe God is perfect. People who believe in science, often don't believe it is perfect. I say often because some people are stupid about their belief in science. However, I've rarely if ever heard the same about God. I understand about ... By: bobbygnosis. on 13 Jul 11, 00:15:29 I understand about methodology. The focus of that methodolgy is 'Truth.' 'Truth', however, is a dialectic entity. Just like God. Evidence of this is that our fixed 'Truths' get discarded on a regular? - indeed increasing - basis. The method leads to fewer and fewer fixed 'Truths.' ^But that's not as funny as this: A.) God is Truth! B.) Science is Truth! A.) God told me he's the real Truth! B.) Science says it's about the real Truth! And so on. "Science" is? a ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 12 Jul 11, 22:48:25 "Science" is? a method, which when applied, can expand human knowledge about the world we live in. "God" refers to a specific character which various groups of humans have applied many different attributes to, and claimed that other groups are wrong simply because they don't believe the same thing. With respect to science and religion, science is agnostic. watch?v=7OCNiz3w9cs This argument is ... By: bobbygnosis. on 12 Jul 11, 21:58:49 This argument is identical to the atheist argument. All you? do is substitute 'Science' for 'God' and it's the same thing. So true. Perfect ... By: zigifrojd. on 12 Jul 11, 15:44:46 So true. Perfect example of religious moronic? thinking. The view total on ... By: TheReasonWhyGuy. on 10 Jul 11, 16:27:03 The view total on this is? is OVER 9000!!!! OVER PWNED That ... By: 6runge. on 24 Jun 11, 05:06:27 OVER PWNED That the smartest thing i ever? read about anything umm what if someone ... By: kinkajuu1. on 19 May 11, 13:34:56 umm what if someone like me accepted all people and all they believed in? i mean, i have christian friends, athiest friends, muslim, jewish, and probably more but i dont ask about it why not just? respect everyones personal beliefs and get over this damn war of ideals?   You like it? Share it! Social Bookmarking

Iphone apps videos :: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Feedback powered by: Customer Feedback